I cannot remember exactly when I began using “soft eyes” to see, or what specifically led me to the discovery in the first place, however I do know that it came at a time of self awareness, introspection and soul connection.

Soft eyes began when I became aware of the “hard focus” of my vision. Take a moment and notice the point where your eyes focus upon. Now look at the same point, but this time notice not the point of focus but the visual field that surrounds the point of focus. Notice that although fuzzy, the surrounding visual field offers great richness in color, pattern and movement. For me, seeing the peripheral field requires a gradual softening of my gaze; consequently, I call seeing with attention to the periphery “soft eyes.”

Although drawing attention to the peripheral field may seem trivial, doing so (at least for me) radically changed my percepts. For example, after spending a significant amount of time seeing with soft eyes, shapes of objects became far more distinct. The contrast was startling. Since then, ordinary seeing feels flat and deceiving, as if another world is hidden behind the flatness we are conditioned to seeing. In another instance, colors began to vibrate; the depth of feeling I experienced was profound.

I invite you to see with soft eyes and share your experiences with comments.

{ 0 comments }

Every Friday morning, I plan to read a few pages of Joseph Chilton Pearce’s Crack in the Cosmic Egg. I will share my notes as I move through the book each week.

Reality is not a fixed entity

There is a relationship between what we think is out there in the world and what we experience as being out there. Specifically there is a rough mirroring that takes place between our mind and our reality. We cannot stand outside this mirroring process because we are the process. It’s important to regard the mirroring process as the only fixed element and all of its products as relative. Said another way, what is discovered by man is never the “universal” truth; rather, the process by which the mind brings about discovery is itself the “universal.”

It is commonly thought that the “world out there” informs the mind through our senses. Although true, a critical insight is missing. Our concepts and basic assumptions actively direct our precepts. The “selective program of the mind” directs what we see, feel and hear. We must learn that our mind directs our sensory apparatus every bit as much as our sensory apparatus informs the mind. JCP refers to the pattern as concept-precept interaction.

The world to view is determined by our worldview

If we accept that reality is not fixed but represented, then how does our representation come about? According to Jerome Bruner, the way we represent the world arises from our whole social fabric – the rich web of language, myth, history, ways of doing things, unconsciously-accepted attitudes, notions and so on. Our “reality-adjustment” begins in childhood and goes forth as we become cooperating threads in the social web.

My final thought on the matter

If our worldview is arbitrary, then why don’t we recognize it as such? Probably because considering our worldview as arbitrary places our entire reality in the same questionable position.

{ 0 comments }

In early 2006, I wrote 8 short essays to share with friends about daily living. After rereading them only days ago, I figured you may enjoy them too:

{ 0 comments }

This morning I pull into Chevron behind a large van. I step outside, insert the pump and get back in my car. As I take survey of the customers around me, I notice the woman next to me: late 30s, bleached hair, white track suit and Gucci sunglasses. She watches a boy in his late teens, and I follow her gaze. The boy traverses the parking lot and walks in front of the van in front of me. Expecting the boy to continue walking on the van’s other side, it surprises me when he doesn’t. Said another way, he disappears behind the van and fails too reappear. And here begins the morning’s thought:

How do I know he didn’t disappear altogether? How do I know he’s still behind the van? Over the last 100,000 times that I’ve watched people disappear behind objects, I’ve not witnessed someone completely disappear. Yet. So I assume he’s still present.

A lesson we all learn in early childhood, trivial. Let’s continue. I scan my rear view mirror and notice a ton of activity behind me: cars passing by, conversations in the parking lot across the street, pedestrians walking the sidewalk. Here begins the real thought: Around us all of the time, thousands of conversations, activities and moments between strangers we cannot see occur.

What mentally construct do we use to handle this? We know life occurs around us whether we see it or not. Do we imagine this unseen world? Or do we focus entirely on the immediate world in front of us, the world that we actually see, and forget the unseen world? If we imagine the unseen world, what does it look like? For me, I pay attention to this world rarely. And when I do, it is quick and fleeting. I see a thousand identical homes without roofs. I fly over each house and peer inside. One house has a family, another has a couple arguing, the next has a man watching TV, and so on… Basically I see a page from a children’s storybook. Ask yourself: do you envision the unseen world, and if so, what does it look like?

I conclude that for most, we maintain little to no conscious vision of the unseen world. We know it exists, yet it rarely impacts our internal world. If it is not conscious, then is is unconscious? Or said another way, are we psychically aware of those around us? My suspicion, or hope, is yes. I won’t detail why I believe this except for a quick example. Of all the cities I’ve walked, Los Angeles effects me the most psychically and emotionally (with Brooklyn a close second). One Fourth of July, the entire city bubbled with joy. Sure everyone enjoyed the day off and time with family. However beyond the immediate joy stood something greater. It felt as if underneath it all, we Los Angelians knew everyone else was experiencing the same joy. The celebration reverberated and built within a massive, positive feedback loop of joy. It has one of my happiest days. And over the coming years, more Los Angelians said it was their favorite day too. Something happened that day that we all felt.

For fun, I suggest taking a few moments today and envisioning the world of people you cannot see.

{ 0 comments }

TYPE: New Construction
LOCATION: Old Palo Alto
STYLE: Spanish Revival
STATUS: Available (at time of post)

After spending the past few weeks walking new construction in Palo Alto, I must say, there are floor plans that I really like and floor plans I vehemently dislike. The main level definitely falls into the former category.

Main Level

The main level houses the primary living space, including the living room, dining room, kitchen, family room and study. Think of the flow as a “Q”: the living space flows in a circular path around the central stairs, with the living and dining rooms in the lower-left half, the kitchen and family room in the upper-right half, and the study as the accent stroke. What’s to like?

First, the great room makes an “L” instead of being another box. The “L” pattern is more conducive to protecting space (for example, the kitchen gives enough protection to enjoy a conversation while someone else is watching TV). Second, the family room flows into either the courtyard or rear yard (perfect for casual parties of 20 or more). Third, the formal entertaining area is large enough to accommodate real entertaining. Although obvious, most formal entertaining areas today are too small (and therefore will be used in only rare occasions). Ultimately, the following architectural patterns are used well:

  • Floor plan flow
  • Outdoor connection
  • Windows on two sides or more

Quickly on the kitchen: The kitchen window looks at a old-growth tree and portion of the front yard (compare this with looking at a wall or fence). Moreover the stove positions the user perpendicular to the breakfast nook (compare this with your back to the nook, a position that’s much worse). All in all, it is well designed.

Lower Level

Like many of the new homes in Palo Alto and Menlo Park, the lower level contains the recreation room (in addition to the second kitchen, gym, wine cellar, laundry area and additional bedrooms). All in all, I am not a fan of using the lower level as a recreation area because frankly, the light is usually terrible. I prefer to call them the “media dungeons”. Thankfully, the architect connected the recreation area to the upstairs patio via a wall of glass and wide staircase. Personally, I definitely spend time in the downstairs area.

  • Good natural light in recreation area

Site Orientation

Because the front door faces south (leaving the home), direct sunlight moves nicely from morning to evening. Consider the following path:

  1. In the morning: casual living space (family room and breakfast nook)
  2. In the afternoon: study, courtyard and half the family room
  3. In the evening: formal entertaining space (living and dining room)

{ 2 comments }

LOCATION Old Palo Alto
STYLE Spanish / Mediterranean
ARCHITECT Stephen Pogue
DESIGNER Alex Miller Cole
BUILDER J5 Homes

The home uses the following architectural patterns very well:

  • defined space
  • outside connection
  • windows on at least two sides
  • site orientation.

This post is the first in a series of four, with each post describing one pattern in detail. Before I describe how the home defines space, lets look at the overall floor plan.

Floor Plan

Defined Space

One of my favorite features of the Well-Balanced Box is how well it balances the macro functions of formal entertaining, relaxed living and sleep. The structure clearly defines each of these spaces into zones. The formal living space, as below shows, occupies the left half of the first floor. The dining room, living room and outdoor yard are clearly joined.

Formal Entertaining

Small walls define the spaces individually. For example, an arched-barrier separates the dining room from the living room, and a partial wall separates the living room from the outdoor yard. Although protection of space is important for many reasons, with this house, the reason is simple: people feel more comfortable in smaller groups. Imagine a great party someday where four couples stand around the dining table eating food, a large group surrounded by smaller ones occupies the living room, and many conversations of two to three people occupy the outside. Next, imagine standing outside. You move from room to room, finding new conversations, not only in content, but also in number of participants (think back on conversations that are one-to-one versus one-to many. Very different!)

Now remove the dividers. The space becomes one. When it becomes one large space, I’d argue people would begin to feel uncomfortable. For me at least, I much prefer the intimacy of a small room to a massive ballroom. The latter creates too much pressure to navigate the room, say hello to all, and facilitates small talk versus longer, deeper, more meaningful conversations.

Casual Living

Next, consider the relaxed living space. The home partitions two zones: a mini great room on the first floor and family room-spa on the ground floor. The mini great room does a good job of creating three intimate and functional spaces within the room. The configuration below shows the functions of cooking, working (think homework or casual projects), eating, socializing and watching TV.

Sleeping Space

Finally, the sleeping space is divided between the downstairs room and the top floor. Two things I like: first, it facilitates many different room arrangements. The rooms with the Jack-and-Jill bathroom are perfect for younger siblings. I like it because it would make the kids share and take dual responsibility for keeping it clean, and it allows private access between rooms (for late night storytelling, or whatever). The downstairs room is perfect for an older child or office. Or, put the office in the suite adjacent to the master suite or in the room with balcony access. I like the latter because you can walk to your office in the morning by balcony. The master suite allows its occupants to sleep, read, watch TV or relax in the tub with four spaces: bed, sitting area by windows, outdoor balcony or bathroom.

Next time we look the pattern outside connection.

{ 0 comments }

When spaces are poorly defined, people don’t spend time in them. Define them, and their occupants flourish. What makes a space well defined? Thinking about possible reasons, I identified the following three features:

  • Separate spaces with different functions
  • Join spaces with common functions
  • Build the room only if it achieves its intended purpose

Separate spaces with different functions

If two spaces flow into each other with separate purposes, such as a living room flowing into a family room, then one usually subsumes the other. A new home in Menlo Park’s Willows had the following floor plan:

Floor plan where living spaces are not protected

Join spaces with common functions

When spaces that are commonly used in conjunction, such as a living room and dining room for formal entertaining, are divorced from one another, then the flow is interrupted. Or said another way, the casual thought of moving from the dining to the living space is less natural.

Floor plan where dining and living rooms are not connected

Instead, join these spaces. When these spaces are put together, the “entertaining space” is both defined and protected. Or consider the great room. The most common great room joins an open kitchen and casual eating space with the family room. People love intimate socializing and watching TV (sports, film, favorite shows) with food. Also, imagine a family at work: one child watching TV, one child doing homework at the kitchen table, and the parents(s) making a meal. All three activities, albeit separate, are joined by a common purpose: being together.

Build the room only if it achieves its intended purpose

This concept is less defined that the previous ones. Ultimately it stems from rooms that feel designed as if they were an afterthought. Or the room was designed without thought of its actual occupants.

Again, I refer to the living room. My thought on the living room is simple: its used for entertaining guests. I find conversations between guests ebb and flow between smaller conversations, one on one or one to few, and group conversations where all are involved. In order to accommodate this, the room must provide enough space for multiple seating arrangements. Imagine a central, primary seating area (with two couches facing each other) surrounded by groups of one or more smaller areas (two or three chairs). The problem I see, within most new construction, is small living rooms. If you’re going to build it small, don’t build it at all. Why? The room accommodates three couples or less. If the group is that small, then its likely casual, and casual groups instead choose the intimacy of the family room.

Well-Defined Space: Physical space (actual shape) must be congruent with social space (how people actually use and spend time in a room).

{ 1 comment }

Bathtub with a View

One of my favorites, from my list of fun, someday maybe goals, is building a home that incorporates a bathtub with a view. Imagine relaxing in a warm soaking tub. In front of you are large, floor-to-ceiling windows. Your gaze wanders naturally through them, not so much focusing on any specific point but instead it takes the scene in entirety. Because its dusk and the lights are off, the room is filled with a bluish almost violet light. The sun sets over the ocean, skyline, mountains, or lake (insert favorite vista). Your eyes close. You focus on the warmth.

I love the visual, and fortunately for me, I enjoyed it in person. About ten years ago, while staying in South Lake Tahoe, my father, with his inimitable charm, brightened the day of the woman booking our room. For a small moment of jovial conversation, she booked us in one of the casino’s nicest suites. And neither of us gambles! The next day, home from skiing, I figured, “I’m on vacation, why not take a bath.” Since a child, I hate light from unnatural sources and love natural light (at home, I turn the lights on only when its completely dark). I jumped in the tub before sunset. Imagine Lake Tahoe before you: star destroyer clouds capping massive white mountains surrounding a crystal blue lake. The mountains changed from yellow to orange to purple to blue. I staid in the tub for hours, and I repeated the experience each consecutive day.

{ 0 comments }

My office is in San Carlos and my home in Palo Alto, so I spend significant amounts of time in both cities. While driving into San Carlos yesterday from the 101 (yes, I say “the 101”, having lived in Los Angeles for six years), I noticed a major obstacle that the San Carlos downtown must overcome in order to grow into a more mature one: walking access to destination points from Caltrain is somewhat insurmountable. Compared with Palo Alto, where access to downtown is a short, protected walk, access to destination points in San Carlos is not.

Please note: I love downtown San Carlos. I grew up in San Carlos, and more important, I enjoy its quaint feel. The article is meant as a study in urban design, and it’s not meant as a critique of San Carlos downtown. Many people like it the way it is – the “slow growth” folks.

Access to Destination Points
Lets start with what I call “destination points”. A destination point is a place that has significant attraction to outside people. In Palo Alto, it may be a restaurant (St. Michael’s Alley), a café (Coupa Café), or a theater (Stanford Theater). In San Carlos, it is mainly the restaurants on the 700 block of Laurel Street (Town Restaurant). My thought is simple: a mature downtown provides easy walking access from major transit, which in our area is Caltrain. Thinking about “easy walking access” since yesterday, I’ve come up with three advantages that Palo Alto offers over San Carlos: protection, distance and variation. Let’s look at them briefly.

Protection
First, the walk from Palo Alto train station into downtown follows a protected path. It starts with a walk down a flight of stairs to an elevated walkway (with railing), then through a short crosswalk (at a lightly trafficked stop sign), and soon after you’re in downtown. The following photo shows the protected walkway and crosswalk:

On the other hand, consider the walk from Caltrain to the 700 block of Laurel Street in San Carlos. It starts with an unattractive walk across El Camino, a five-lane boulevard (six counting the turn lane). The light takes awhile, there is only one crosswalk, and traffic moves fast. The walk down San Carlos Avenue is less than pleasing. Albeit less trafficked than El Camino Real, the street accommodates two lanes each way of cars that move quickly (four lanes total). The following photo shows what in my opinion, on a subtle level, is a less than appealing walk into downtown:

Distance
Second, consider distance. In Palo Alto, destination points start within 500 feet of Caltrain (Junnoon, Palo Alto Bicycles, Lavanda). On the other hand, the walk from Caltrain to the 700 block of Laurel Street is 1500 feet. The difference may not seem like much, however when you convert the distances into miles (0.09 and 0.28 miles respectively), you see the difference. Think of a running track in your mind. Between walking one straightaway versus a full lap, which would you prefer?

Variation in Walking Paths
Finally, Palo Alto’s distribution of nearby destination points and grid of avenues-alleys-streets (University Ave, Hamilton Ave, Lytton Ave run east to west; High St, Emerson St, Ramona St, Bryant St, Waverly St, Cowper St, Webster St run north to south) give the pedestrian a myriad of choices when choosing walking paths to major destinations. In the drawing below, black squares represent destination points. How many paths do you count?

I counted around 15. Compare that with San Carlos. Most pedestrians (if they have a choice) prefer streets with as little car traffic as possible. Also, I took the train to Bellarmine College Prep for four years and walked down San Carlos Avenue nearly every day. And I drive the street everyday too. In my experience, I’d say 99% of the people I see walk San Carlos Avenue into town (and less than 1% walk along El Camino). That leaves one path to the 700 block of Laurel Street. See below.

Final Thoughts
I don’t consider myself the end-all-be-all authority on urban design. Hardly. However I do think about these things on a regular basis. Seriously, its just the way that I’m wired. I just notice these things while driving, walking, whatever. I can’t help myself. So in the coming weeks, expect more writings about local urban design. Why? Because I enjoy writing about it. If you like these articles, please comment (any feedback would be great). More than anything, I hope you, faithful reader, begin noticing the subtleties of the spaces we live in – both private (homes) and public (towns).

{ 2 comments }

Single-Family Floorplan (3 bedrooms)

Over the next few weeks, I depart from writing on broad real estate topics and instead focus on architecture, namely new construction in the Peninsula, specifically new single-family homes in Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Redwood City. What excites me most about architecture in these areas is not the finishes, materials or what we typically see, but the way rooms flow, the floor plan and how space is generally used. In my opinion, the spaces and flow between spaces in a home are one of the most important considerations when evaluating a new home purchase. Why? Whether we spend all of our time or no time in room is usually determined by how well the space is crafted.

Consider the following questions: how many windows, of what size, and how many walls have windows? What direction and view do these windows face? Is the room connected to the world outside or is it isolated? Is the room connected to the rest of the house or is isolated? You get the point. While TV home shows, magazines and pop culture suggest we look at finishes and materials (and thereby become better consumers), I suggest we see what is not normally seen.

So my goal is simple: by looking at new homes throughout the coming weeks, we’ll teach each other how to look at space with a new perspective, a perspective that is sensitive to how well each space compliments the life we live today and the life we are creating for tomorrow (me with my posts, and you with your comments). Imagine walking into a home and instantly knowing whether it sustains life or flattens it. With that said, I hope you look forward to my first post on a very well done, Spanish Villa in Professorville, Palo Alto.

{ 0 comments }